Re: performance....
"Richard Seaman, Jr." <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:29:18 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ngpt.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:06:07AM -0500, Saurabh Desai wrote: > > I used your benchmark program for this (for yield tests). > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:32:14PM -0500, Saurabh Desai wrote: > > > > Actually, on my 4-way system, I am seeing exactly other way around. > > NGPT - about 5 secs. > > Linuxthreads - about 48 secs. > > What benchmark are you using? The same one I did? Or > something else? > > -- > Richard Seaman, Jr. email: [email protected] > 5182 N. Maple Lane phone: 262-367-5450 > Nashotah WI 53058 fax: 262-367-5852 Well, I re-ran the tests here, which is UP, just to make sure I didn't accidentally reverse the results. I still get basically the same result (I can't get access to a quiet system at the moment, so the results are off marginally from what I posted since there is a small load on the system. I'd be interested if you can confirm my general results on a UP system? If so, it would be very interesting to try to understand why the results would differ so dramatically from a UP to a 4 way system. It would also be interesting to know what kernel and scheduler you're running. If there is such a dramatic difference between a UP and a 4-way box (factor of 6 one way vs factor of 8 or 9 the opposite way), I wonder if it doesn't point up some problem in the kernel scheduler for 4 way vs. UP? -- Richard Seaman, Jr. email: [email protected] 5182 N. Maple Lane phone: 262-367-5450 Nashotah WI 53058 fax: 262-367-5852