Re: nProbe / ntopng in large home network
Dan Staley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ntop.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHHm-BnRD-wCFEk1GVPwjf_GMLNUBv+AucN_bduAM9PdTskhvw@mail.gmail.com> |
I have the following network setup in a large community house with 24 users, each of whom have 2-7 devices who all use it exvlusively to connect to the Internet: As you can see I am slowly replacing cheap unreliable hardware with more reliable Cisco equipment. I’d like to better understand the traffic flows to improve performance and it looks like nProbe and ntopng could help with this. I have read few articles posted over a number of years about running nProbe and ntopng on low cost hardware. Has anyone got any advice about: 1. whether nProbe/ntopng is the right solution for our house (on a budget) – am I barking up the right tree? 2. The architecture – should I connect a nProbe / ntopng node to the router and port mirror the port running to the switch? I would like to avoid adding a point of failure which would be introduced using the similar solution of putting the nProbe between the switch and the router or router and internet proposed here <http://www.ntop.org/nprobe/how-to-build-a-100e-augmented-netflowipfix-probe-ubiquity/> . 3. up-to-date advice about suitable low cost hardware which can run both nProbe and ntopng and handle the volume of traffic. Thanks very much, Dan _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
image002.png
(image/png, 118.2 KB) - not displayed