Re: Owl kickstart
David Parrish <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:08:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.openwall.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPd5SoX3HTNGx=N_3bTzTqxhnbYbamZmgH++wwvbZDs88ZL5Ow@mail.gmail.com> |
> > Whether you pick Owl 2 or Owl 3, you would still be quite far from what > WE is using, since there's no web hosting software in Owl itself - it's > just the base system. WebEnabled has much extra software on top of Owl. If I can get Owl 3 working with guest additions then I'll probably add RPMs to give me a basic LAMP stack. All I really care about at that point is the versions of the running applications. Which is why I am wondering if a version of CentOS with close version numbers to what WE runs would have been a smarter strategy. > >> Anyway, here is my work so far on the veewee template in case anyone >> is interested. https://github.com/dmp1ce/veewee-owl2 I'll probably >> give Owl3 a shot next. > > Curious. If/when you update this for Owl 3, I suggest that you use > "settle -d" (dumb terminal mode). I will give "settle -d" a try. Thanks for all the help! David