Difference between Oprofile results and Perf results running the same use case
Sabra Gargouri <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.oprofile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
I would like to profile my system when running my own application , so for that purpose I used Oprofile and also Perf tool. I run separately Oprofile and Perf with the same use case (same application and same duration).
When using Oprofile, I configured opcontrol with --event=CPU_ CYCLES:100000:0:1:1 and for perf , I used -c 100000 to be sure that both tools are sampling with the same event counter.
When generating results for each tool, I noticed a difference in the percentages. Below are results generated with Perf:
# Events: 362K cycles
#
# Overhead Samples Command
# ........ .......... ...............
#
31.40% 113991 kthreadd
31.12% 112975 swapper
11.96% 43418 dvbtest
7.31% 26539 SE-Aud-Mixer
4.34% 15750 kworker/0:1
3.33% 12070 klogd
3.31% 12033 syslogd
2.57% 9327 irq/140-vsync0
1.12% 4058 perf
0.90% 3258 kworker/1:1
0.55% 1990 irq/141-vsync1
0.39% 1414 INF-EvtAsyncCb
0.35% 1270 rcu_preempt
0.31% 1108 VIB-Hpd/0
0.21% 768 ksoftirqd/0
0.19% 688 sshd
0.14% 498 udevd
0.11% 416 pkill
0.11% 403 kworker/u4:0
0.04% 138 INP-FE-IP1
0.04% 136 INP-FE-IP0
0.03% 127 INP-FE-IP5
0.03% 121 INP-FE-IP2
0.03% 118 INP-FE-IP3
0.03% 107 ICS-Watchdog
0.03% 106 INP-FE-IP4
0.03% 101 VIB-HdmiRxMonit
0.01% 40 init
0.00% 11 ksoftirqd/1
0.00% 8 dtach
0.00% 6 rpcbind
0.00% 2 ICS-Nsrv
0.00% 2 :36
0.00% 1 ICS-Admin
and here after results generated with Oprofile :
CPU_CYCLES:100000|
samples| %|
------------------
1492238 76.8928 vmlinux
230774 11.8914 libc-2.14.1.so
107878 5.5588 dvbtest
55578 2.8639 player2
16198 0.8347 oprofiled
15934 0.8211 mme
7958 0.4101 stmcore_display_stiH407
3226 0.1662 ics
1975 0.1018 libpthread-2.14.1.so
1547 0.0797 sth264pp
1155 0.0595 ksound
1107 0.0570 libcrypto.so.1.0.0
899 0.0463 stm_event
832 0.0429 syslogd
466 0.0240 klogd
445 0.0229 ld-2.14.1.so
428 0.0221 strelayfs
416 0.0214 bash
378 0.0195 stm_wrapper
238 0.0123 stlinuxtv
206 0.0106 stm_registry
182 0.0094 stm_pixel_capture
140 0.0072 displaylink
131 0.0068 stm_memsrcsink
101 0.0052 stm_fe_ip
52 0.0027 sshd
37 0.0019 vibe_os
24 0.0012 hdmirx_stiH407
22 0.0011 libprocps.so.1.1.0
22 0.0011 osdev_abs
20 0.0010 ophelp
15 7.7e-04 gawk
15 7.7e-04 udevd
6 3.1e-04 libnss_files-2.14.1.so
4 2.1e-04 pkill
3 1.5e-04 grep
3 1.5e-04 sleep
3 1.5e-04 libm-2.14.1.so
3 1.5e-04 init
2 1.0e-04 libgcc_s-4.8.2.so.1
2 1.0e-04 libresolv-2.14.1.so
2 1.0e-04 libpopt.so.0.0.0
2 1.0e-04 libtirpc.so.1.0.10
1 5.2e-05 rm
1 5.2e-05 seq
1 5.2e-05 libbfd-2.23.2.so
1 5.2e-05 libgmp.so.10.1.3
1 5.2e-05 libwrap.so.0.7.6
My focus is on "dvbtest" application. As you see in the results, Oprofile shows 5.558% against 11.96% with Perf.
Why results are so different?
PS: I used Oprofile 0.97 version, because it's the version available in the environment where I have to test and could not use the versions later.
Regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
oprofile-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list