Re: [PATCH] s390: Add support for z13
Andreas Arnez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.oprofile |
|---|---|
| Organization | IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Oct 12 2016, Michael Petlan wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Andreas Arnez wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 04 2016, Michael Petlan wrote: >> >>> Hi Andreas, >>> >>> have you or anyone tested this patch and/or s390 oprofile support >>> in general? I'd love to know more about the results or at least, >>> if there any, what has been tested and what not + whether there >>> are any known issues regarding to HW sampling on s390. >> >> IIRC, I just performed a quick smoke test before submitting this patch; >> and oprofile didn't crash. Other than that, I don't really know what >> works and what doesn't. >> > > Could you please try it with setting /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict to '0' > and /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid to '-1', being logged as root user? Sure, I'll probably try this tomorrow. [...] >> * The --help/--usage options of operf and ocount behave strangely. >> E.g., they attempt perf_open and just emit a cryptic error message if >> that fails. And upon success they still yield exit code 1. > > Maybe if /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid is '2' and the user is not > root, this might happen. Right. The complaint is about the cryptic error message and the fact that not even --help/--usage works in this case. -- Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot