Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v4 02/10] include: Move compat_timespec/ timeval to compat_time.h
Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.driver-project.devel,gmane.linux.ports.mips.general,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.kernel.year-2038,gmane.linux.oprofile,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABeXuvpFfD+a6tSSOvni=v23DuJ-bWeZwmnzg4SU+TR=WHxs7Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:50 AM, Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> wrote: >> The file arch/arm64/kernel/process.c needs asm/compat.h also to be >> included directly since this is included conditionally from >> include/compat.h. This does seem to be typical of arm64 as I was not >> completely able to get rid of asm/compat.h includes for arm64 in this >> series. My plan is to have separate patches to get rid of asm/compat.h >> includes for the architectures that are not straight forward to keep >> this series simple. >> I will fix this and update the series. >> > > I ran across the same thing in two more files during randconfig testing on > arm64 now, adding this fixup on top for the moment, but maybe there > is a better way: I was looking at how Al tested his uaccess patches: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg108752.html He seems to be running the kbuild bot tests on his own git. Is it possible to verify it this way on the 2038 tree? Or, I could host a tree also. Thanks, Deepa