Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v4 02/10] include: Move compat_timespec/ timeval to compat_time.h
Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.driver-project.devel,gmane.linux.ports.mips.general,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.kernel.year-2038,gmane.linux.oprofile,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:04:04AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:50 AM, Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> The file arch/arm64/kernel/process.c needs asm/compat.h also to be >>>> included directly since this is included conditionally from >>>> include/compat.h. This does seem to be typical of arm64 as I was not >>>> completely able to get rid of asm/compat.h includes for arm64 in this >>>> series. My plan is to have separate patches to get rid of asm/compat.h >>>> includes for the architectures that are not straight forward to keep >>>> this series simple. >>>> I will fix this and update the series. >>>> >>> >>> I ran across the same thing in two more files during randconfig testing on >>> arm64 now, adding this fixup on top for the moment, but maybe there >>> is a better way: >> >> I was looking at how Al tested his uaccess patches: >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg108752.html >> >> He seems to be running the kbuild bot tests on his own git. >> Is it possible to verify it this way on the 2038 tree? Or, I could >> host a tree also. > >The kbuild bot should generally pick up any branch on git.kernel.org, >and the patches sent to the mailing list. It tests a lot of things >configurations, but I tend to find some things that it doesn't find >by doing lots of randconfig builds on fewer target architectures >(I only build arm, arm64 and x86 regularly). > >I remember that there was some discussion about a method >to get the bot to test other branches (besides asking Fengguang >to add it manually), but I don't remember what came out of that. People can send email to me or [email protected] for adding new git URLs to 0day tests. Such requests are very welcome. Server load is not a problem -- don't worry about your git pushes adding our test load. By default all branches in a git tree will be tested, unless there are explicit blacklist/whitelist. We also have scripts to scan git.kernel.org/github/LKML looking for possible new git URLs to add to 0day kbuild tests. However depending on the team's maintenance pressure they may or may not run frequently. Thanks, Fengguang