Re: [PATCH] oprofile-tests increase iterations for anon_remap test
Michael Petlan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.oprofile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alpine.LRH.2.20.1807241348310.17770@Diego> |
Hi, I am afraid that this change causes the workload to time-out on slower systems. spawn -ignore SIGHUP rm -f /tmp/operf_run.VRlD spawn -ignore SIGHUP rm -f /tmp/operf_output.E0Bz spawn -ignore SIGHUP rm -f /tmp/operf_create_stop_script.dRZg spawn -ignore SIGHUP rm -f /tmp/operf_stop_operf.PSCD spawn -ignore SIGHUP hide ./oprofile_data spawn -ignore SIGHUP ophelp -r ppc64 POWER8 spawn -ignore SIGHUP ls workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap_bin workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap_bin spawn -ignore SIGHUP operf --callgraph --lazy-conversion --events CYCLES:1500000:0:1:1, workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap_bin operf: Profiler started WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: operf check callgraph output: operf --callgraph --lazy-conversion --events CYCLES:1500000:0:1:1, workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap_bin Maybe 20000 could be enough, or we'd need to bump the timeout limit too. You did not encounter any timeout when testing this, did you? Michael On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Will Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > We've noticed the anon_remap.c testcase failing on some of our systems. > From a verbose test run log, we note that the anon_remap_bin workload is > getting just a small number of the overall samples. > Results vary greatly depending on the system size and speed. > > > samples % app name symbol name > > 5031 99.7620 /no-vmlinux /no-vmlinux > > 5 0.0991 /usr/bin/bash /usr/bin/bash > > 1 0.0198 /home/willschm/oprofile-tests/testsuite/workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap_bin 00000017.plt_call.memcpy@@GLIBC_2.17 > > 1 0.0198 /home/willschm/oprofile-tests/testsuite/workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap_bin initialize_anon_func > > The (anon_remap.c) testcase itself will take an argument to override the > default number of iterations, but as far as I can tell the test harness > does not handle passing arguments to the test itself. > I've instead increased the default iteration to a much higher > value, this seems sufficient to allow the test to pass. > > Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <[email protected]> > > -- > > anon_remap.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > diff --git a/testsuite/workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap.c b/testsuite/workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap.c > index 293476d..bbff472 100644 > --- a/testsuite/workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap.c > +++ b/testsuite/workloads/anon_remap_src/anon_remap.c > @@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > int iter_max; > > if (argc == 2) > iter_max = atoi(argv[1]); > else > - iter_max = 2000; > + iter_max = 40000; > > page_size = (size_t)sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE); > initial_buffer_size = (MINIMUM_BUFFER_SIZE / page_size + 1) * page_size; > /* remapped_buffer_size must be larger than initial_buffer_size */ > remapped_buffer_size = initial_buffer_size * 2; > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > oprofile-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot