Re: [PATCH] MIPS: OProfile: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Paul Burton <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:44:28 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.oprofile,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <MWHPR2201MB12774C1C54015019C8FD92EEC1DC0@MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> |
Hello, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > This patch fixes the following warning (Building: mips): > > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_cpu_stop’: > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:217:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfctrl3(0); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:218:2: note: here > case 3: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:219:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfctrl2(0); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:220:2: note: here > case 2: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:221:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfctrl1(0); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:222:2: note: here > case 1: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_cpu_start’: > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:197:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfctrl3(WHAT | reg.control[3]); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:198:2: note: here > case 3: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:199:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfctrl2(WHAT | reg.control[2]); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:200:2: note: here > case 2: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:201:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfctrl1(WHAT | reg.control[1]); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:202:2: note: here > case 1: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘reset_counters’: > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:299:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfcntr3(0); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:300:2: note: here > case 3: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:302:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfcntr2(0); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:303:2: note: here > case 2: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:305:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfcntr1(0); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:306:2: note: here > case 1: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_perfcount_handler’: > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:242:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > if ((control & MIPS_PERFCTRL_IE) && ^ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:248:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’ > HANDLE_COUNTER(3) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:239:2: note: here > case n + 1: ^ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:249:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’ > HANDLE_COUNTER(2) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:242:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > if ((control & MIPS_PERFCTRL_IE) && ^ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:249:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’ > HANDLE_COUNTER(2) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:239:2: note: here > case n + 1: ^ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:250:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’ > HANDLE_COUNTER(1) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:242:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > if ((control & MIPS_PERFCTRL_IE) && ^ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:250:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’ > HANDLE_COUNTER(1) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:239:2: note: here > case n + 1: ^ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:251:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’ > HANDLE_COUNTER(0) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > CC usr/include/linux/pmu.h.s > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_cpu_setup’: > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:174:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfcntr3(reg.counter[3]); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:175:2: note: here > case 3: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:177:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfcntr2(reg.counter[2]); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:178:2: note: here > case 2: > ^~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:180:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > w_c0_perfcntr1(reg.counter[1]); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:181:2: note: here > case 1: > ^~~~ > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> Applied to mips-fixes. Thanks, Paul [ This message was auto-generated; if you believe anything is incorrect then please email [email protected] to report it. ]