Re: [pam_access.so] How to ignore account expiration error(s)

ANIL KARADAĞ <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.pam
Message-ID <CAC+LVcZ3KEqxmMb99n6ZckweZgeowUP_sg-TuJ6iHcn8rAhiJA@mail.gmail.com>
hi Jon,


I updated my crond file content according to your reply but result does not
change.

===========  /etc/pam.d/crond  ================
#
# The PAM configuration file for the cron daemon
#
#
auth       sufficient pam_env.so
auth       required   pam_rootok.so
auth       include    system-auth

account    sufficient pam_rootok.so
#account    required   pam_access.so
#account    include   system-auth
account    required   pam_unix.so
account    required   pam_tally.so

session    required   pam_loginuid.so
session    include    system-auth

===================================



On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Jon Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> What I do in these situations is manually do the "include" for
> system-auth and then remove the unnecessary lines.
> That is, keep your first two lines, then replace the third line with
> the "account" entries of system-auth. At that point you have an
> identical setup but you can now try commenting out the pam_access
> account line without needing to affect any other pam files which may
> also include system-auth.
>
> -- Jon Miller
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:18 AM, ANIL KARADAĞ <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > /etc/pam.d/crond includes the following lines;
> >
> > account    sufficient  pam_rootok.so
> > account    required   pam_access.so
> > account    include    system-auth
> >
> > crond with the above lines exits with an account expiration error if root
> > password is expired.
> >
> > If crond uses "account    sufficient   pam_access.so" instead of "account
> >  required   pam_access.so", root's jobs can be run.
> >
> > Does "sufficient" flag cause to access problem?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ben <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/28/2011 5:39 AM, Jon Miller wrote:
> >> > Sorry but I do not have a direct answer to your question, however it
> >> > is my opinion that the use of pam_access doesn't make much sense for
> >> > /etc/pam.d/crond. Cronjobs are for users which already have access
> >> > whereas pam_access would be controlling who gained access in the first
> >> > place. My suggestion is to completely remove that line from crond.
> >> >
> >> > -- Jon Miller
> >>
> >> I suspect that pam_access is used to deny expired users. you might look
> >> at adding a root ok module first.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ben Hildred
> >> Estimator
> >> Applied Plastic Coatings, Inc.
> >> 5000 Tabor St.
> >> Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
> >> 303 424 9200
> >> F: 303 424 8800
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://appliedplastic.com
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pam-list mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anıl KARADAĞ
> > http://anilkaradag.info/blog
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pam-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pam-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
>



-- 
Anıl KARADAĞ
http://anilkaradag.info/blog

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.