Re: [PATCH] parport: parport_pc: PCI SIO access should also depend on SIO option
Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.parport |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 01 May 2016 03:07 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > Hi Greg, > Hi Sudip, > > On 01.05.2016 09:45, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 01:56:40PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:09:51PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_SUPERIO toggles Super IO chip support in parport_pc >>>> code, however only code accessing SIO chip via ISA (or LPC) bus was >>>> conditional on it. >>>> >>>> This patch makes SIO chip accesses via PCI bus also dependent on this >>>> config option. >>>> >>>> It should be noted that Super IO support in parport_pc is needed only when >>>> firmware has failed to make parallel port available either via PNP or >>>> on standard I/O ranges and user has one of a few supported SIOs. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> This patch is not tested on any superio chip based hardware. (I also >>>> don't have one). >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2227051.html >>>> >>>> I know you dislike adding #ifdef so its upto you. >>> >>> It's really a messy patch, surely there is a better solution. >> >> yes, might be. But without hardware, should i dare? <snip> > Other possibility that comes to my mind would be to split out all such > probing code to separate file and then either compile it or not > depending on CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_SUPERIO. I thought of this one, but the lack of hardware to test is the only reason I am hesitating. regards sudip