Re: True Parallel Port Interface for Bit-banging?

Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:29:35 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.drivers.i2c,gmane.linux.parport
Message-ID	<20161025142935.GA2875@katana>

> Would the ExpressCard Parallel Port appear always at the same address?
> While this could work, it wouldn't be generic. I would have to do the operation
> for N apps.

I see.

> The virtualisation idea is not good then?

It is not that. I think good old DOSEMU could do that. Bit-Banging ports
can be timing critical, though, and in this department virtualization
solutions often fail.

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYD2xPAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2Wo8QAIiU2qEOjm090pFd8kzVM/u7
FxB7vhulUzSIOB5IC0NUdIzdm0B5HIsmUGn8hUIY+QMyiGFlGimpKSkrbki3Ud10
vdEvPuPH7kXMiKpX/7fDZjBoCTLDPVS5dbygWeRbPZkTPLLPwJKUXtjXMti3XQmx
ZgVcAjT+822D/qq8e6OiH9wrarrsBIV6Gr8tiQAI3XgOlojxYk8mFBnhdSH0EUHZ
qYGUjlGwkKayz9GZLM0bTC+iJeS9U+0QBe90YqH0p2HCmELJ1lWC2OfCAVo0EleJ
EkOqMefk/kS9smT7cIH4h9XgAQEcXEuL0gg8QYG3VzjA8w2l9y51pvI6za9J1Clt
el+uItSkm6NLGo4u93EaMacaacqiEG3dqJdnMzSl1Dyx6yh7rbPky6dlSHXMd35c
pvRm64frfvPww0//9gomwOlEjcXIgD/GhQTdzveWXsrYRHF1ZfF51kO3edzTV0UO
6YhhCuS9pj1IZ2jHVHDl4InCUKw0G12C/DaabGhw61GwVN4I7cHq16KPFCFXRQxY
v5T3Aqtt8PC5Nymd2F5fnv4Bv/jSJMgR+d9c7VzDFugziyZzmMs13sOHrKa1maxV
NPmDC1Z+Vw93/n15SmXuy72PjIi1NHEgTmASxnN8DvApvQtW5Y6mWsGJH9OTdWGV
EnxC3CLMH3zS/6M74OiL
=f09G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.