Re: True Parallel Port Interface for Bit-banging?
Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.i2c,gmane.linux.parport |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20161025171752.GA4274@katana> |
> Or is the "timing issue" you talk about more related to unpredictable > latencies due to the way the SW virtualisation works? Yes, it is all about latencies and meeting deadlines. This is probably why the application is DOS after all. > What about emulation? Do you think emulation would be more predictable? No difference as long as there is a multi-tasking OS in the background. Yes, the RT patchset might help...
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYD5PGAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2x98P/RZEO/0Xa3QKFiSeblblw8xh fmwwJtmmwQr0CT+y4ZkTwbDbKkGh/VWw2SOqVaH1UpV/teGbkEEIWsiPZ06gWRkn lQOaVqaqGyQxPIkU55BUOsYtDTBgZwZMuSl2d0kiHhMTf26zOXkOakbdsmZcwrnX 45Uh4gAGFOk4APs8W3yWcs+7SzHfldOIAIHOy2ZRLrROZJ2id2OXybQK+HPiRl/g UuKNpnBztaBX0UdWhc7CWlRTBmq9+ZN6tE4O8sCsMzCCLGcePxIgdqDPbBfxSq7D P+nLZrJnbd1uas1byIlKI8Eog4IQpik38Js8Z9LVFRMVjxqCvQlGPizYMCpDOXNy A/hewuqEGnS8U9jeaLWPXvibcHTEpLI2TrdzetCX8z981m1+8ixvyZyKGUYNa0hf r5Fqr6i6BmZDaw07g2bbRbyc4nK3/9Ty0EnLTs5knjEhaPx6xyezuulGyx6WpeuO KbaqB8Pul6P7zc09osi0dGeHqI2a1KmTWTCliOcHNyTQF8zcN8P3rQJe0zrYA1Ci MCm8mo679kk3BvYDi/HOVjiBVdwFJq1oBP4J55+vV/9rfgbdbH/RqLC3HniVLrYD o4R0LmUWqjPYdQ1+Rnpn08MHCh8Szm6uJOUHJ/ncSCw4vb68BDK5Csd0YIvl5g5A XqjMzYP7Vo7MFL1eF8kI =4q6s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----