Re: regression from 3.2.3 to 3.2.4
Guillaume Cottenceau <[email protected]> 29 Aug 2003 18:23:01 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.pcmcia.devel,gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Hinds <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:56:22PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > > That was why I explained it would be cool if it was possible to > > do *fallbacks* on PCI vendor/device (for example, using pcnet_cs > > for that one - not axnet_cs). > > (by the way, these are not PCI vendor/device numbers) Ah sorry. They really looked like some to me :/. > Yes you could do fallbacks. I do not want to do fallbacks. I want > cards to break and be reported as broken, so that the config file gets > fixed properly. I see. Thanks for your messages! -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf