Re: Problem in the man xml files.
Yuri Kozlov <[email protected]> Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:55:26 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.pld.shadow.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2005/9/17, Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Yuri Kozlov wrote: > > > > Contens of the <listitem> must be in a <para> tags: > > <listitem><para>group account information</para></listitem> > > > > I can not found whats a docbook standard said, but its worked. > > I know about this. Also I know this workaroud. > > This is bug in XML DTD files content or in XSLT sheets. If current shadow > XML are files incorrect and must have this additional <para></para> it > must be reported by XML parser (basing on DTD). If XML DTD is correct > something must be fixed in XSLT sheets first. > I'm still not adding this <para></para> because it will be plain hiding > some real bug on XML DTD or XSLT sheets side (or even XML parser). > I'm waiting for some neccessary solution on XML/XSLT level. > > Anyway using docbook-xsl-1.69.0 generates correct roff files (in sense man > roff syntax). Yes .. worse look&feel but correct syntax :) > Ok, how about section Examples of this: http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/para.html <itemizedlist> <listitem><para>It was slow</para></listitem> <listitem><para>It ran hot</para></listitem> <listitem><para>It didn't actually work</para></listitem> </itemizedlist> Of these three, the last was probably the most important. </para> Why they are using a <para> tag? I`m subscribed on list. -- Regards, Yuri Kozlov