Re: Problem in the man xml files.

Yuri Kozlov <[email protected]> Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:55:26 +0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.pld.shadow.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2005/9/17, Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Yuri Kozlov wrote:
> >
> > Contens of the <listitem> must be in a <para> tags:
> > <listitem><para>group account information</para></listitem>
> >
> > I can not found whats a docbook standard said, but its worked.
> 
> I know about this. Also I know this workaroud.
> 
> This is bug in XML DTD files content or in XSLT sheets. If current shadow
> XML are files incorrect and must have this additional <para></para> it
> must be reported by XML parser (basing on DTD). If XML DTD is correct
> something must be fixed in XSLT sheets first.
> I'm still not adding this <para></para> because it will be plain hiding
> some real bug on XML DTD or XSLT sheets side (or even XML parser).
> I'm waiting for some neccessary solution on XML/XSLT level.
> 
> Anyway using docbook-xsl-1.69.0 generates correct roff files (in sense man
> roff syntax). Yes .. worse look&feel but correct syntax :)
> 
Ok, how about section Examples of this:
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/para.html

<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para>It was slow</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>It ran hot</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>It didn't actually work</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>
Of these three, the last was probably the most important.
</para>

Why they are using a <para> tag?

I`m subscribed on list.
-- 
Regards,
Yuri Kozlov