Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Re: [patch] document useradd behavior when run without the -g option
Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:22:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.pld.shadow.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dnia 12-06-2006, pon o godzinie 07:50 +0200, Christian Perrier napisał(a): > > The same reasons is on refuse any patches for RH/Fedora -r extension > > because this also now handled by -K <KEY>=<VALUE>. > > Which is actually too bad as that one made it to the LSB, like it or > not.... > > Actually we don't really care in Debian as we added the relevant patch > to our "specific" patches, but you know about our will to avoid > specific patches as much as possible. Short comment: shadow useradd *always* handles -r like functionality .. even before introducing by RH this change. Previous it was accessible by undocumented -O <KEY>=<VALUE>. After make this documented I decide change this to similar Solaris -K KEY>=<VALUE>. After introducing -r option by RH it was pushed this to LSB .. still *without* consultation with Marek Michałkiewicz (previous shadow maintainer) or me. It was second time when this was accrues. First was with -M option in useradd. Now we have another case with -l option. Question: what to do when some persons have short(er than other people) path for make some thing and their introduces some completely stupid things a law ? kloczek