Re: groupmems

Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:50:30 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.pld.shadow.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--0-1603696138-1152813030=:10018
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, George Kraft wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 18:35 +0200, Tomasz K³oczko wrote:
>> Yes, right but it is on my short TODO list.
>
> groupmems has been in shadow-utils' CVS for six years now :-) and has
> had seven modifications.

But it does not introduces importand changes :)
All this modifications was added during general code review/cleanups.

> If similar functionality is designed but not
> scheduled, then would PAMifying groupmems be acceptable?

Yes. The same as rewrite for use getopt_long() too :)
After this groupmems can be moved to src/Makefile.am::ubin_PROGRAMS.

> From a security point of view, would it be better to setuid a shorter
> specific purpose groupmems than a larger usermod?

In this point you are right and this argument changes all this discussion 
:)

BTW: I can't recall is groupmems was submitted for include under the 
same license as rest shadow or not ? (shadow is BSD).

kloczek
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Ludzie nie maj± problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzaj±*
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz K³oczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: [email protected]*
--0-1603696138-1152813030=:10018
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline