Re: groupmems
Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:50:30 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.pld.shadow.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1603696138-1152813030=:10018 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, George Kraft wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 18:35 +0200, Tomasz K³oczko wrote: >> Yes, right but it is on my short TODO list. > > groupmems has been in shadow-utils' CVS for six years now :-) and has > had seven modifications. But it does not introduces importand changes :) All this modifications was added during general code review/cleanups. > If similar functionality is designed but not > scheduled, then would PAMifying groupmems be acceptable? Yes. The same as rewrite for use getopt_long() too :) After this groupmems can be moved to src/Makefile.am::ubin_PROGRAMS. > From a security point of view, would it be better to setuid a shorter > specific purpose groupmems than a larger usermod? In this point you are right and this argument changes all this discussion :) BTW: I can't recall is groupmems was submitted for include under the same license as rest shadow or not ? (shadow is BSD). kloczek -- ----------------------------------------------------------- *Ludzie nie maj± problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzaj±* ----------------------------------------------------------- Tomasz K³oczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: [email protected]* --0-1603696138-1152813030=:10018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline