Re: framebuffer driver on s3c6xx in 2.6.30kernel.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:23:14AM +0300, misha wrote:
> Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:58:38PM +0300, Mikhail wrote:
> >   
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> I've compiled recent 2.6.30 kernel for s3c6400 processor with default
> >> configuration for smdk6400.
> >>     
> >
> > Is this a straight 2.6.30, or one of the 2.6.30-git releases. The s3c64xx
> > project is ongoing.

The same comments for the 6400 apply for the 6410, the work is currently
being merged and thus you may find you'll have to go for a later kernel.
  
> I've use straight 2.6.30.
> > I've not tried the fb driver on the smdk for a while, it was developed
> > for the OpenMoko and the S3C6410. Whilst it should work for the S3C6400
> > I'll try and test it in the next couple of days.
> >
> >   
> I've got smdk6410 board - result is the same (configuration in the 
> kernel is only one).
> According to datasheet - no differences between 400 and 410 in 
> framebuffer subsystem.
> I've used and oscilloscope to test nets - no toggling at all. so I 
> suppose LCD controller itself do not operate.
> I'm would very surprised if this kernel configuration will work on 
> openmoko or any other boards
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
> FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
> Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php

-- 
-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.


-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php