Re: Revision number in /proc/cpuinfo query

On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, javier Martin wrote:
> Hardware        : Vista Silicon Visstrim_M10
> Revision        : 0000
> Serial          : 0000000000000000
>
> As i found in the code, Revision is the value of the global variable
> "system_rev", but I have noticed that only the pxa boards, magician
> and viper use this code.
>
> Is it legal to add my own desired Revision code in my board file or
> should I respect some standard numbers for ARM?

Hi,
the Freescale convention is:
i.MX27 CHIP_REV_1_0  -> system_rev = 0x27010
i.MX27 CHIP_REV_2_0  -> system_rev = 0x27020
i.MX27 CHIP_REV_2_1  -> system_rev = 0x27021

I'm using this code to set system_rev:

--- linux-2.6.27.22.orig/arch/arm/mach-mx2/cpu_imx27.c	2009-05-02 13:35:23.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.27.22/arch/arm/mach-mx2/cpu_imx27.c	2009-07-03 03:06:20.000000000 -0400
@@ -43,6 +43,20 @@

 	cpu_silicon_rev = (int)(val >> 28);
 	cpu_partnumber = (int)((val >> 12) & 0xFFFF);
+
+	if(cpu_partnumber == 0x8821 && system_rev == 0) {
+		switch (cpu_silicon_rev) {
+		case 0:
+			system_rev = 0x27010;
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			system_rev = 0x27020;
+			break;
+		case 2:
+			system_rev = 0x27021;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 }

 /*

The Freescale VPU library reads "Revision" from /proc/cpuinfo to
determine which firmware blob it should load into the VPU, that's
why I needed this.

BTW, I found these defines in
imx27_ads_20071219-rel3-ltib.iso
-> /bootloaders/redboot_200749.tar.gz
-> redboot_200749/src/patch-redboot-200749-mx27.bz2
-> ecos_mx27/packages/hal/arm/mx27/var/current/src/soc_misc.c

Eric

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php