Re: Annoying warning message caused by double modifiers

Cheng-Han Tsai <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.arm.general
Message-ID <C83C9D54.44%[email protected]>
Hi, Vasut, 

The kernel version is 2.6.29

Check here for irqreturn_t
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.29/include/linux/irqreturn.h#L19

The TCM is backported from 2.6.32
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.32/arch/arm/include/asm/tcm.h#L24

This driver is proprietary. Sorry I could not share with you.
However, the key seems not to be the driver, right?

Thanks.

Keene


On 2010/6/13 下午11:07, "Marek Vasut" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dne Út 1. června 2010 21:06:15 Cheng-Han Tsai napsal(a):
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> Please help me solve this annoying warning messages.
>> This warning message happens when I enable the TCM support in my arm
>> platform
>> 
>> drivers/input/keyboard/kpd.c:560: warning: passing argument 2 of
>> 'request_irq' from incompatible pointer type
>> include/linux/interrupt.h:78: note: expected 'irq_handler_t' but argument
>> is of type 'irqreturn_t (*)(int,  void *)'
>> 
>> kpd.c
>> static irqreturn_t __tcmfunc kpd_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) {
>>        disable_irq(KP_IRQ_LINE);
>>        ...
>>        return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>> 
>> Other definitions:
>> typedef int irqreturn_t;
>> #define __tcmfunc __attribute__((long_call)) __section(.tcm.text) noinline
>> 
>> Compiler seems to think “irqreturn_t” and “irqreturn_t __tcmfunc” are
>> different types.
>> I try all different ways to add the __tcmfunc modifier, but the warning
>> still shows up.
>> Could you give some hint?
>> Thank.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Keene Tsai 蔡承翰
> 
> Hi, I don't see any such driver in the kernel tree, maybe you tell us the
> kernel 
> version? Or possibly share the driver ?
> 
> Cheers



_______________________________________________
linux-arm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.