Re: Annoying warning message caused by double modifiers
Cheng-Han Tsai <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.arm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C83C9D54.44%[email protected]> |
Hi, Vasut, The kernel version is 2.6.29 Check here for irqreturn_t http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.29/include/linux/irqreturn.h#L19 The TCM is backported from 2.6.32 http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.32/arch/arm/include/asm/tcm.h#L24 This driver is proprietary. Sorry I could not share with you. However, the key seems not to be the driver, right? Thanks. Keene On 2010/6/13 下午11:07, "Marek Vasut" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne Út 1. června 2010 21:06:15 Cheng-Han Tsai napsal(a): >> Dear all, >> >> Please help me solve this annoying warning messages. >> This warning message happens when I enable the TCM support in my arm >> platform >> >> drivers/input/keyboard/kpd.c:560: warning: passing argument 2 of >> 'request_irq' from incompatible pointer type >> include/linux/interrupt.h:78: note: expected 'irq_handler_t' but argument >> is of type 'irqreturn_t (*)(int, void *)' >> >> kpd.c >> static irqreturn_t __tcmfunc kpd_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { >> disable_irq(KP_IRQ_LINE); >> ... >> return IRQ_HANDLED; >> } >> >> Other definitions: >> typedef int irqreturn_t; >> #define __tcmfunc __attribute__((long_call)) __section(.tcm.text) noinline >> >> Compiler seems to think “irqreturn_t” and “irqreturn_t __tcmfunc” are >> different types. >> I try all different ways to add the __tcmfunc modifier, but the warning >> still shows up. >> Could you give some hint? >> Thank. >> >> Best Regards, >> Keene Tsai 蔡承翰 > > Hi, I don't see any such driver in the kernel tree, maybe you tell us the > kernel > version? Or possibly share the driver ? > > Cheers _______________________________________________ linux-arm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm