Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus
Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:52:17 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: >> Changes from v8: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] >> * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch. > > Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply > series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3) > and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other > maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel > (typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different > branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what > for-next/core is, as the name implies). > The reason is that these two patches create conflicts. Since this series involves file movement, resolving those conflicts was not straightforward. Therefore, I rebased the series on top of both of the following commits: commit 24f55f511b9e ("virt: arm-cca-guest: use migrate_disable() for attestation token requests") commit e62decaf98e7 ("arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform") -aneesh