Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Fix inactive SVE and SSVE regsets

On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 10:27:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > As noted in the changelog applying patch 1 as a fix and this only for
> > -next blows up the fp-ptrace test rather impressively in any
> > configuration which can generate headers only reports:

> >    https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/3075737#L3231

> > for the release.  Both patches really do need to go together.

> By "blows up" you mean the test fails, right? That's the same behaviour
> if anybody runs the test on a kernel without the fix. Both patches are
> merged in for-next/core.

Right, the test starts reporting 96 fails which doesn't look great in a
dashboard.  I'd misread the original branch as being merged as a fix but
I see it's not been merged into the fixes branch, sorry for the
confusion.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmp0etwACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9Cj5Af/RbhK3IBFPx1Y04cMjPSnwL1Cn4ML+QhLP/52CHHOMTpnRcP1+VnW5dAn
zcHezU4q3urEGIfdn0/i2LE7ZoigpjxV20tEyPlzVbG37e4+Ofd+kZS56fJuYiC5
NVtv6M4JSeW/+sn83mTYmgGMZHAKCLufpqfUXDlWCLuZvnqIzCM0FpqyUEem2rWA
r3EMTFd5fGlfyMToQEY2V+EATPL9ivAcgLoh+vJkPyAs6dAJm38tU81llNLGFYQA
xgKzFf1CmDmf+fxsnjksO0Hgb5mlU994v6r7C6IapvBA3x2o8coL7bZnK/BOkLIQ
wg1zPZ676mCKUVKGLw7tm5AGZXGJuQ==
=8cS5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----