Re: Some coordination
Free The Cube <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.game-cube.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arthur Othieno wrote: > IMHO, you're better off going with the bus-layer -> device-driver > architecture, initially. That way, the bus driver handles things like > probing for and maintaining a list of existing devices, binding device > drivers to devices, handling PM and hotplug events, etc, while device > drivers handle stuff like enabling the device, accessing configuration > space and communicating with the drive. > > Don't get me wrong here - if you feel more comfortable starting with your > approach, feel free to do so. We can always move over later on :) > > > Arthur You're right :) !!!! But the "temporary" driver is written :), it need more tests (it's a port of the GCLIB driver so it should work correclty (i hope) :) I will work on the SI driver... Regards, Free The Cube. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn