Re: [PATCH] shmat() and CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP

On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:15:58PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> I think this patch for the shmat() is obviously correct for our stack (which grows up).
> Basically we gain a small region of 4 Pages in which shmat() may map memory.
> 
> Ok ?
> If yes, should I commit or send to linux-kernel mailing list ?
> 

The latter please, I don't feel comfortable merging such things before they
have had discussion somewhere. You can commit it too, but please make sure it
gets sent to linux-kernel.

Thanks,
	Kyle