Re: Re: Fw: Another problem with making things static
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.hppa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:25:52 -0700 Grant Grundler <[email protected]> wrote: > > My attempt to build a working parisc cross-compiler failed, which doesn't help. > > I appreciate your attempt to build parisc-linux. > Could you post which source tree and which build command line you used? It was maybe a year back - I spent a couple of days wrestling with crosstool, ended up with _some_ useful crosscompilers (alpha, arm, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, s390, sparc, sparc64 and x86_64). parisc was one of the ones which I gave up on but I do not have a record of what the problem was, sorry. It would have been a toolchain problem, not a kernel problem. The most usual failure mode was simply inability to find any combination of gcc/binutils/glibc which could be compiled. > I'm pretty sure this can be fixed. > We've used cross compilers in the past so I know it's worked before. I say this a lot, but... It is in the interests of arch maintainers to help others to build cross-compilers. If someone were to prepare a web page (or even a script) which could be used to generate a kernel cross-compilation environment for parisc then the parisc maintainers would see a lot less breakage. For one, I do allmodconfig on all architectures on all patches I get (and that includes all the git trees). If stuff breaks, the breaker gets to hear about it, before it gets merged.