Re: NPTL for hppa-linux is not backwards compatible with Linuxthreads.

Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.glibc,gmane.linux.ports.hppa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jeff Bailey a écrit :
> On 19/02/07, Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> if the breakage is just in pthreads, i dont think the libc ABI needs to be
>>>> bumped, just the pthread one ?  libc provides look ahead stub functions for
>>>> pthreads, so it shouldnt be affected by the breakage you've mentioned with
>>>> static lock initializers ...
>>>>
>>>> libpthread.so.0 -> libpthread.so.1
>>> While it's definetly Ubuntu and Debian's problem, not upstream's,
>>> libpthread is bundled in the "libc6" package.  Bumping just the
>>> libpthread version will make packaging hard for those distros.  If
>>> there are other ABI breaking moves that need to be done that would
>>> cause a bump from libc6, doing them now would help sidestep the
>>> problem.
>> Well I am thinking in splitting out libpthread.so.X from the libc6
>> package if the ABI breakage is confirmed. This is still a very
>> complicated transition, but I think far less packages are affected.
> 
> Well, the ABI breakage is confirmed.  I just remember people siting
> some other corner case problems with the ABI they wanted to change.
> Now would be a great time to change it all over if we need to do this.

You mean on hppa? Do you remember the proposed changes, or the people
wanted to change that?

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [email protected]         | [email protected]
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.