Re: NPTL for hppa-linux is not backwards compatible with Linuxthreads.
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.glibc,gmane.linux.ports.hppa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeff Bailey a écrit : > On 19/02/07, Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> if the breakage is just in pthreads, i dont think the libc ABI needs to be >>>> bumped, just the pthread one ? libc provides look ahead stub functions for >>>> pthreads, so it shouldnt be affected by the breakage you've mentioned with >>>> static lock initializers ... >>>> >>>> libpthread.so.0 -> libpthread.so.1 >>> While it's definetly Ubuntu and Debian's problem, not upstream's, >>> libpthread is bundled in the "libc6" package. Bumping just the >>> libpthread version will make packaging hard for those distros. If >>> there are other ABI breaking moves that need to be done that would >>> cause a bump from libc6, doing them now would help sidestep the >>> problem. >> Well I am thinking in splitting out libpthread.so.X from the libc6 >> package if the ABI breakage is confirmed. This is still a very >> complicated transition, but I think far less packages are affected. > > Well, the ABI breakage is confirmed. I just remember people siting > some other corner case problems with the ABI they wanted to change. > Now would be a great time to change it all over if we need to do this. You mean on hppa? Do you remember the proposed changes, or the people wanted to change that? -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [email protected] | [email protected] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]