Re: greylisting test
Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.hppa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:40:24PM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > John David Anglin wrote: > >>On 3/1/07, Kyle McMartin <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:38:13AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > >>>>let's see if this works... > >>>> > >>>X-Greylist: delayed 514 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at palinux; Thu, 01 Mar > >>>2007 > >>>08:49:49 MST > >>> > >>>Ok. Let's hope this cuts down some of the spam to @parisc-linux.org > >>>even more... > >>Thanks dude! > > > >The downside is increased delay and probability of messages > >being lost. The company that I do most of my work for hasn't > >been very happy with its mail service provider. It uses > >greylisting. On the otherhand, it may work better for a list. > > Does this list get a lot of spam? I've only been subscribed to it for a > about a month, but I haven't seen any at all. Is my SA setup just that good? > the list isn't effected because it's not hosted on palinux. this effects *@parisc-linux.org, which, for me at least, receives way too much spam. the list gets no spam these days because non-subscriber messages are silently queued (silently, because people tend to whine about it.)