Re: missing system calls ?

On Saturday 17 March 2007, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:48:56PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:203:3: warning: #warning syscall sigaction not implemented
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:218:3: warning: #warning syscall sigsuspend not implemented
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:359:3: warning: #warning syscall sigreturn not implemented
> 
> We don't support non-realtime signals (the syscalls are rt_*)
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:68:3: warning: #warning syscall umount not implemented
> 
> umount2
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:248:3: warning: #warning syscall select not implemented
> 
> newselect
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:269:3: warning: #warning syscall readdir not implemented
> 
> obsolete
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:308:3: warning: #warning syscall socketcall not implemented
> 
> we don't use the socketcall multiplexer (presumably because we don't need
> to put the args on the stack) for socket/bind/connect/ etc...
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:353:3: warning: #warning syscall ipc not implemented
> 
> same story as socketcall, obsolete multiplexed syscall
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:749:3: warning: #warning syscall fadvise64 not implemented
> 
> sys_fadvise64_64 versus fadvise64 is a reordering of syscall args, presumably
> because loff_t is 64bit and needs to be passed in pairs.
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:800:3: warning: #warning syscall statfs64 not implemented
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:803:3: warning: #warning syscall fstatfs64 not implemented
> 
> Your kernel is too old. 2.6.21-rc3 has this.
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:809:3: warning: #warning syscall utimes not implemented
> 
> Dunno about this one. sys_utimes seems to just call futimesat anyways.
> 
> > init/missing_syscalls.h:845:3: warning: #warning syscall kexec_load not implemented
> 
> nobody's implemented kexec yet. :)

Thanks Kyle !

So parisc-linux has all important (and currently on PA possible) syscalls wired up.
Nice to know.

Helge