Re: Re: hanging linuxthread processes

James Bottomley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.hppa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 13:26 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 12:16 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > > Are you considering your patch for Kyle's CFP?
> > 
> > Er, what patch?
> 
> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2007-February/031385.html

This one, definitely not ... it doesn't work ... I need to get acess to
a machine again where I can play around with it.

> There's also the somewhat related space register issue associated with
> TLB flushing:
> 
> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2007-February/031365.html

I think this one works OK ... but we could do with checking it

> Randolph's change to tlbflush.h is broken and needs to be reverted
> if we don't have a better fix yet.

I really think these problems demonstrate this new approach to patch
management is non functional.  I bet even the good patch has had no
testing at all for the last two months.  I'm afraid that unless I care
about a patch (i.e. I need it for something I'm doing), I shoot it
across the list and forget about it.  Previously, when I checked it into
the repository and forgot about it, at least it was being built and
tested ... and someone would eventually notice if it needed to go
upstream.

James
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.