Re: Re: hanging linuxthread processes
James Bottomley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.hppa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 13:26 -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 12:16 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > Are you considering your patch for Kyle's CFP? > > > > Er, what patch? > > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2007-February/031385.html This one, definitely not ... it doesn't work ... I need to get acess to a machine again where I can play around with it. > There's also the somewhat related space register issue associated with > TLB flushing: > > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2007-February/031365.html I think this one works OK ... but we could do with checking it > Randolph's change to tlbflush.h is broken and needs to be reverted > if we don't have a better fix yet. I really think these problems demonstrate this new approach to patch management is non functional. I bet even the good patch has had no testing at all for the last two months. I'm afraid that unless I care about a patch (i.e. I need it for something I'm doing), I shoot it across the list and forget about it. Previously, when I checked it into the repository and forgot about it, at least it was being built and tested ... and someone would eventually notice if it needed to go upstream. James