Re: PA glibc nls bug
"Carlos O'Donell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.hppa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/21/07, John David Anglin <[email protected]> wrote: > In the following test program, the call to nl_langinfo_l returns an > incorrect wchar_t string. We are dropping the first two wide chars: > 0x0000897f 0x00005143. You can see the difference by running this > test on x86 and parisc under gdb, or by printing pp. Please give me a program with: 1. Expected output. 2. Actual result. cat >> wchart.c <<EOF #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <locale.h> #include <langinfo.h> #include <wchar.h> int main () { const char *ls = "zh_TW"; locale_t loc; char *nl; int i; loc = newlocale (1 << LC_ALL, ls, 0); if (loc == NULL) return 1; nl = nl_langinfo_l (_NL_WD_FMT, loc); if (nl == NULL) return 1; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) printf ("%02x", nl[i]); printf ("\n"); return 0; } EOF gcc -O0 -Wall -pedantic -g3 -D_GNU_SOURCE -o wchart wchart.c On x86: 2500000059000000745e000025000000 On parisc: 000000250000005900005e7400000025 I don't see any difference other than byte ordering? What are you seeing? Cheers, Carlos.