Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: variable length argument support
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.hppa,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:54:21 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It is a bit peculiar in that we have one task with two mm's, one of which is > > > inactive. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > + flush_cache_page(bprm->vma, kpos, > > > + page_to_pfn(kmapped_page)); > > Bah, and my frv cross build bums out on an unrelated change,.. > I'll see if I can get a noMMU arch building, in the mean time, would you > try this: > > --- > > Since no-MMU doesn't do the fancy inactive mm access there is no need to > flush cache. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > --- > > Index: linux-2.6-2/fs/exec.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6-2.orig/fs/exec.c 2007-06-05 16:48:52.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6-2/fs/exec.c 2007-06-06 10:49:19.000000000 +0200 > @@ -428,8 +428,10 @@ static int copy_strings(int argc, char _ > kmapped_page = page; > kaddr = kmap(kmapped_page); > kpos = pos & PAGE_MASK; > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU > flush_cache_page(bprm->vma, kpos, > page_to_pfn(kmapped_page)); > +#endif > } > if (copy_from_user(kaddr+offset, str, bytes_to_copy)) { > ret = -EFAULT; > I think the same problem will happen on NOMMU && STACK_GROWS_UP. There are several new references to bprm->vma in there, not all inside CONFIG_MMU.