Re: [PATCH 0/4] ppc, fbdev: Clean up fbdev mmap helper
Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.ports.ia64,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> writes: > Refactor fb_pgprotect() in PowerPC to work without struct file. Then > clean up and rename fb_pgprotect(). This change has been discussed at > [1] in the context of refactoring fbdev's mmap code. > > The first three patches adapt PowerPC's internal interfaces to > provide a phys_mem_access_prot() that works without struct file. Neither > the architecture code or fbdev helpers need the parameter. > > Patch 4 replaces fbdev's fb_pgprotect() with fb_pgprot_device() on > all architectures. The new helper with its stream-lined interface > enables more refactoring within fbdev's mmap implementation. The content of this series is OK, but the way it's structured makes it a real headache to merge, because it's mostly powerpc changes and then a dependant cross architecture patch at the end. It would be simpler if patch 4 was first and just passed file=NULL to the powerpc helper, with an explanation that it's unused and will be dropped in a future cleanup. We could then put the first patch (previously patch 4) in a topic branch that is shared between the powerpc tree and the fbdev tree, and then the powerpc changes could be staged on top of that through the powerpc tree. cheers