Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded,gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Amit Machhiwal <[email protected]> writes: > Introduce a new capability and ioctl to expose CPU compatibility modes > supported by the host processor for nested guests. > > On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations (N) can operate in > compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations, like (N-1) and > (N-2). This is particularly relevant for nested virtualization, where > nested KVM guests may need to run with a specific processor compatibility > level. > > Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS capability and the corresponding > KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS vm ioctl. The ioctl returns a bitmap describing > the compatibility modes supported by the host in respective bit numbers, > allowing userspace (e.g., QEMU) to select an appropriate compatibility > level when configuring nested KVM guests. > > The ioctl handling is added in kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() and retrieves host > CPU compatibility capabilities via a PowerPC-specific backend > implementation when available. > > The struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps places the 'size' field first so it can > be read alone via get_user() before copy_struct_from_user() is called, > avoiding pointer arithmetic to locate the size field. > > The ioctl is defined using _IO so the ioctl number remains stable even if > the struct grows in future versions. It uses copy_struct_from_user() and > copy_struct_to_user() to provide forward- and backward-compatible > extensibility: older userspace passing a smaller struct to a newer kernel > gets zero-padded trailing fields, while newer userspace passing a larger > struct to an older kernel (usize > ksize) gets sizeof(struct > kvm_ppc_compat_caps) written back to host_caps.size so it can retry with the > older kernel-supported size, after which the kernel returns -E2BIG. > > KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0 is defined as a frozen integer constant > (24) marking the size of the initial struct version, used as the > minimum floor for size field validation, similar to other versioned > struct interfaces in the kernel. > > The 'flags' field is reserved for future use. The kernel rejects any > call where flags is non-zero with -EINVAL, preventing garbage values > from being baked into ABI permanently. > > The ioctl returns appropriate error codes: EINVAL for an invalid size > or non-zero reserved fields, E2BIG if new userspace provides a larger > struct than the kernel knows about (with ksize written back into > host_caps.size for the retry), EFAULT for failed copy operations, and > ENOTTY if the backend doesn't implement get_compat_caps. > > Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <[email protected]> > --- > Changes in this version: > - KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS: add hv_enabled guard to align the capability > check with ioctl availability; a PR KVM VM on pseries now correctly > returns 0 for the capability [Sashiko] > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 + > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 8 ++++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 3 ++ > 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > index 0953f2daa466..169ea6a7fbad 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > @@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ struct kvmppc_ops { > bool (*hash_v3_possible)(void); > int (*create_vm_debugfs)(struct kvm *kvm); > int (*create_vcpu_debugfs)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct dentry *debugfs_dentry); > + int (*get_compat_caps)(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps); > }; > > extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_hv_ops; > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > index 077c5437f521..19e53d5ae540 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > @@ -437,6 +437,14 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char { > __u64 behaviour_mask; /* valid bits in behaviour */ > }; > > +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS */ > +struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps { > + __u64 size; /* Size of this structure */ > + __u64 flags; /* Reserved for future use */ > + __u64 compat_capabilities; /* Capabilities supported by the host */ > +}; > +#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0 24 /* sizeof first published struct */ > + > /* > * Values for character and character_mask. > * These are identical to the values used by H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS. > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c > index b6b83fe3233f..e64b3cfadd3a 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c > @@ -703,6 +703,13 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext) > } > } > break; > +#if defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE) > + case KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS: > + r = 0; > + if (hv_enabled && kvmhv_on_pseries()) I think sashiko is just complaining in the 1st patch because we have not yet wired up the kvmppc_hv_ops->get_compat_caps() yet in patch-1. I think it is expecting.. if (hv_enabled && kvmhv_on_pseries() && kvmppc_hv_ops->get_compat_caps) But either way is fine. > + r = 1; > + break; > +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE */ > default: > r = 0; > break; > @@ -2469,6 +2476,70 @@ int kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg) > r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->svm_off(kvm); > break; > } > + case KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS: { > + struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps host_caps = {}; > + u64 usize; > + > + /* > + * Read the size field first to drive copy_struct_from_user. > + * size must be the first field of the struct. > + */ > + r = -EFAULT; > + if (get_user(usize, (__u64 __user *)argp)) > + goto out; > + > + /* > + * Enforce a minimum: reject buffers smaller than the initial > + * struct version (VER0). This allows old userspace compiled > + * against the original struct to still work on a newer kernel > + * that has grown the struct with appended fields. > + */ > + r = -EINVAL; > + if (usize < KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0) > + goto out; > + > + /* > + * New userspace with a larger struct called an older kernel. > + * Write back ksize in host_caps.size so userspace knows which > + * older struct to retry with, then fail with -E2BIG. > + */ > + if (usize > sizeof(host_caps)) { > + host_caps.size = sizeof(host_caps); > + r = -EFAULT; > + if (put_user(host_caps.size, (__u64 __user *)argp)) > + goto out; > + r = -E2BIG; > + goto out; > + } You anyways mentioned copy_struct_from_user() is taking care of both forward and backward compat. Then what is the point of this check? shouldn't we get rid of this complete if logic? I don't see a point of this if we are anyway using copy_struct_from_user(). > + > + /* > + * copy_struct_from_user() handles forward/backward compat: > + * usize == ksize: verbatim copy > + * usize < ksize: zero-pad trailing (old userspace, new kernel) + * usize > ksize: succeed iff the trailing bytes userspace + * sent are zero, else -E2BIG shouldn't we add usize > ksize case details, like ^^^, which copy_struct_from_user() handles since we are already adding the details of other 2 cases. </btw snip from copy_struct_from_user kdoc> * There are three cases to consider: * * If @usize == @ksize, then it's copied verbatim. * * If @usize < @ksize, then the userspace has passed an old struct to a * newer kernel. The rest of the trailing bytes in @dst (@ksize - @usize) * are to be zero-filled. * * If @usize > @ksize, then the userspace has passed a new struct to an * older kernel. The trailing bytes unknown to the kernel (@usize - @ksize) * are checked to ensure they are zeroed, otherwise -E2BIG is returned. * * Returns (in all cases, some data may have been copied): * * -E2BIG: (@usize > @ksize) and there are non-zero trailing bytes in @src. * * -EFAULT: access to userspace failed. > + */ > + r = copy_struct_from_user(&host_caps, sizeof(host_caps), > + argp, usize); > + if (r) > + goto out; > + > + /* Reserved fields must be zero */ > + r = -EINVAL; > + if (host_caps.flags) > + goto out; > + > + r = -ENOTTY; > + if (!kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_caps) > + goto out; > + > + r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_caps(&host_caps); > + if (r) > + goto out; > + > + host_caps.size = sizeof(host_caps); shouldn't this be, since we don't want to be reporting a larger size to the user? host_caps.size = min_t(u64, usize, sizeof(host_caps)); > + r = copy_struct_to_user(argp, usize, &host_caps, > + sizeof(host_caps), NULL); > + break; > + } > default: { > struct kvm *kvm = filp->private_data; > r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->arch_vm_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg); > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > index 419011097fa8..70e36e6a0ad4 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > @@ -997,6 +997,7 @@ struct kvm_enable_cap { > #define KVM_CAP_S390_KEYOP 247 > #define KVM_CAP_S390_VSIE_ESAMODE 248 > #define KVM_CAP_S390_HPAGE_2G 249 > +#define KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS 250 > > struct kvm_irq_routing_irqchip { > __u32 irqchip; > @@ -1341,6 +1342,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_keyop { > /* Available with KVM_CAP_COUNTER_OFFSET */ > #define KVM_ARM_SET_COUNTER_OFFSET _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb5, struct kvm_arm_counter_offset) > #define KVM_ARM_GET_REG_WRITABLE_MASKS _IOR(KVMIO, 0xb6, struct reg_mask_range) > +/* Available with KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS */ > +#define KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS _IO(KVMIO, 0xb8) > > /* ioctl for vm fd */ > #define KVM_CREATE_DEVICE _IOWR(KVMIO, 0xe0, struct kvm_create_device) > -- > 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)