Re: Mac-On-Mac Development.
Jose Medeiros <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:53:54 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc.mol.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What is illegal? Running Mac OSX 86 in VMWARE? If I purchase a legal copy of Tiger ( And I have ) then no copyright violation exists. I was just at Mac World and spoke to several Apple executives and SE's stating that I run it on VMWARE for testing purposes, and they mentioned that they would bring this up at their next management meeting with Steve Jobs. On the other hand, I agree with you. It would be nice if VMWARE also ported their app to run on Tiger. Peace, Jose Medeiros ---------------------------------------------------------- On 1/12/06, Steven McGrath <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I have plenty of webspace at my site on chigeek.com. All I am > looking for is coders. The main obsticle is the kernel driver. It > simply needs to be updated for 10.4. From there we can start to work > on other aspects, like sound and networking. > > On 1/10/06, Hex Star <[email protected]> wrote: > > I meant having a VMware so that various versions of MacOS could be run > > within a MacOS on a Mac, not a PC...oh and that is illegal....*sigh* > > why do people pirate Apple products? Especially MacOS X, one of their > > main flagship products...it takes away money they deserve, and I for > > one would hate for them to turn to the ways Micro$oft has turned, what > > with increased prices, the activation system, Micro$oft also has lost > > any innovation...illegally obtaining Apple products takes away their > > money which may cause them to, if it happens enough, go the activation > > way which'd suck...I don't even think they have a registration key > > that is required for install and that could make it's way there if > > people keep bootlegging the PC beta of OS X, plus with less money > > there's less innovation and one of the main reasons I switched to mac > > is because of their great innovation...so c'mon, don't bootleg Apple > > products, of all the illegal activities you could do, do you really > > have to chose to illegally obain Apple products? Why not instead grab > > a copy of Micro$oft Vista? > > > > On 1/9/06, Jose Medeiros <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It all ready runs in VMWARE. I've been running it for several months. > > > > > > Check out this link. > > > http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=6290994&blogID=51581816 > > > > > > Peace, > > > > > > Jose > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > On 1/9/06, Jose Medeiros <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It all ready runs in VMWARE. I've been running it for several months. > > > > > > > > Check out this link. > > > > http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=6290994&blogID=51581816 > > > > > > > > > > > > Jose > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On 1/9/06, Hex Star <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > oh and by the way, perhaps you guys could also mention here if you'd > > > > > be interested in those at VMware writing a version of VMware for the > > > > > mac so that it'd run any MacOS inside of the current OS? Please with > > > > > your reply specify if you'd be interested in this and if I get enough > > > > > yeses I'll send them over to those at VMware to see if we can't get a > > > > > Mac version of VMware developed. :-) If we could get them to develop > > > > > and support VMware for MacOS X it'd be great IMO. > > > > > > > > > > On 1/9/06, Hex Star <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I'd love to have this project more developed, although I am not able > > > > > > to do any coding I could offer webspace for the project...I'd love to > > > > > > see this developed to the point that you could run a full MacOS 9 or > > > > > > below and perhaps in addition all MacOS X versions without having to > > > > > > reboot into the full on OS...VMWare for MacOS X perhaps...VMware X? > > > > > > Anyways I'd love to see this continue to be supported and I hope this > > > > > > project doesn't disappear. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/9/06, Steven McGrath <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I have talked to the developer of Mac-on-Mac, and he doesn't wish to > > > > > > > further develop the application to work on 10.4, or any other future > > > > > > > efforts. Attached below it the email I received from him. I am > > > > > > > curious as to if there is anyone out there who would like to further > > > > > > > develop the application, and pick it up from where it was dropped? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello again, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the problem is not monetary, actually not at all and I would > > > > > > > not feel comfortable accepting donations because I might not > > > > > > > have success. I'm not very good in understanding someone > > > > > > > else's code, especially not if it is rather undocumented. > > > > > > > Samuel Rydh is the founder of the MoL project an probably wrote > > > > > > > most of the code of the VM engine and it appears that he's not going > > > > > > > to continue his development either. Due to the lack of G5 support > > > > > > > and no replies to my mails (to discuss some issues in his code I > > > > > > > don't understand) I lost my ambition to continue the development > > > > > > > of MoM. I prefer to develop things from scratch just to know exactly > > > > > > > what's going on but in case of MoM thats nothing you do within a > > > > > > > couple nights that takes months and probably years. > > > > > > > I suppose the project was doomed by the day the Intel switch was > > > > > > > announced and I did not get any support from some more qualified > > > > > > > open source developers (well there where some who know HTML > > > > > > > and JavaScript but that's not very useful in this case ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Sebastian > > > > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 2005, at 10:20 PM, Steven McGrath wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Damn, This Intel switch is causing a lot of waves to stop development > > > > > > > > in areas such as this. It's sad, because a lot of us would really > > > > > > > > love to continue to use this software. Many of us as well really > > > > > > > > aren't looking forward to the intel switch, however would love to run > > > > > > > > this in 10.4 and get 10.4 running inside it. If the issue is > > > > > > > > monetary, please let me know. I would be happy to donate some money > > > > > > > > to further development and help raise money. I saw a lot of promise > > > > > > > > in this application, and it would be sad to see it rot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/8/05, Sebastian Gregorzyk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Steven, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> I am curious as to if there is any further development ongoing with > > > > > > > >> MoM? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> I doubt it, due to the upcoming Intel switch I see no need for a > > > > > > > >> PowerPC VM for OS X. > > > > > > > >> I'm working on some other projects now and I don't think that I'll > > > > > > > >> have time for MoM. > > > > > > > >> Sorry. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> -Sebastian > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > mol-general mailing list > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > mol-general mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mol-general mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mol-general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general > > > _______________________________________________ > mol-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.maconlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/mol-general >