Re: Viability of this project?
Joseph Jezak <[email protected]> Thu, 18 May 2006 16:59:46 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc.mol.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > You have fixed the linux 2.6 in mol support ? This is indeed great news. Do > you know starting from which version or CVS dats this is in ? And/Or maybe > some kind of howto on how to do this ? No, I haven't made the changes available yet, I'll set something up soon. > Does this need, like in the 2.4 times, somce special linux 2.6 patches ? If > so, would it make sense to port them upstream ? It's just a port of the 2.4 modules. Since they depend upon MOL headers, it may not make sense to push them upstream. I suppose I could look into making a proper MOL platform, we could probably ask for that to be included upstream. - -Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEbOBCwGq7BLLARfoRAlygAKC8/axgZpFTtih9fCg9ErBxlPdqzwCffbku OhRC9EbfIlnldhqQopJYaAc= =Jx2+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----