Re: [PATCH 14/23] riscv/hugetlb: pte_alloc_huge() pte_offset_huge()
Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ia64,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Hugh, On 5/10/23 06:59, Hugh Dickins wrote: > pte_alloc_map() expects to be followed by pte_unmap(), but hugetlb omits > that: to keep balance in future, use the recently added pte_alloc_huge() > instead; with pte_offset_huge() a better name for pte_offset_kernel(). > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> > --- > arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c > index a163a3e0f0d4..80926946759f 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, > > for_each_napot_order(order) { > if (napot_cont_size(order) == sz) { > - pte = pte_alloc_map(mm, pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order)); > + pte = pte_alloc_huge(mm, pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order)); > break; > } > } > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, > > for_each_napot_order(order) { > if (napot_cont_size(order) == sz) { > - pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order)); > + pte = pte_offset_huge(pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order)); > break; > } > } Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]> Thanks, Alex