Re: [PATCH 14/23] riscv/hugetlb: pte_alloc_huge() pte_offset_huge()

On Tue, 09 May 2023 21:59:57 PDT (-0700), [email protected] wrote:
> pte_alloc_map() expects to be followed by pte_unmap(), but hugetlb omits
> that: to keep balance in future, use the recently added pte_alloc_huge()
> instead; with pte_offset_huge() a better name for pte_offset_kernel().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index a163a3e0f0d4..80926946759f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm,
>
>  	for_each_napot_order(order) {
>  		if (napot_cont_size(order) == sz) {
> -			pte = pte_alloc_map(mm, pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order));
> +			pte = pte_alloc_huge(mm, pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order));
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm,
>
>  	for_each_napot_order(order) {
>  		if (napot_cont_size(order) == sz) {
> -			pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order));
> +			pte = pte_offset_huge(pmd, addr & napot_cont_mask(order));
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>