Re: [PATCH 1/2] sh: dma: fix `dmaor_read_reg`/`dmaor_write_reg` macros

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <750f11848a647831ccfd1284ad0a8dd540c8f886.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Hi Artur!

On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 13:41 +0200, Artur Rojek wrote:
> Yikes!
> If this series hasn't been merged yet, perhaps we could fix this issue
> in v2. I have something like this in mind (untested):
> (...)
> Otherwise, I'll send it in separately. Of course we'll also need to fix
> `SH_DMAC_BASE1` so that it's set only for SoCs that feature two DMAC
> modules...

No worries, nothing has been merged yet. For one, the merge windows for 6.4
has been closed and I also haven't merged your patches into my tree yet. Please
take your time to spin up a v2 of your patch set and test them properly.

Maybe you're also interested in the clean-up that Geert suggested in this
thread (ordering of the CPU subtypes and capitalization issues)?

Also, can you write "processor manual" instead of "PM" in the other patch
as well as don't use backticks for the macro names? In fact, I would suggest
retitling the subject to:

	sh: dma: Fix dmaor_read_reg() and dmaor_write_reg() macros

Oh, and I will retest your v2 patches before merging them, of course ;-).

Thanks,
Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.