Re: [PATCH 16/23] s390: gmap use pte_unmap_unlock() not spin_unlock()

Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ia64,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm
Message-ID <ZGS6Q9jb/[email protected]>
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 10:02:32PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> pte_alloc_map_lock() expects to be followed by pte_unmap_unlock(): to
> keep balance in future, pass ptep as well as ptl to gmap_pte_op_end(),
> and use pte_unmap_unlock() instead of direct spin_unlock() (even though
> ptep ends up unused inside the macro).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.