Re: [PATCH 30/30] fbdev: Make support for userspace interfaces configurable

Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel
Message-ID <CAMuHMdU27OK1=B6Qgwd+tyda=MmN0EiC8taUpvAJJOYUFcm88A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Javier,

On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 11:59 AM Javier Martinez Canillas
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> writes:
> >>> I'd also question the argument that there's even fbdev userspace out
> >>> there. It was never popular in it's heyday and definitely hasn't
> >>> improved since then. Even the 3 people who still ask for fbdev support
> >>
> >> There's X.org, DirectFB, SDL, ...
> >
> > None of these examples has a dependency on fbdev. They can freely switch
> > backends and have moved to DRM. Anything program utilizing these
> > examples has no dependency on fbdev either.
> >
> > When I say "userspace" in this context, it's the one old program that
> > supports nothing but fbdev. TBH I'm having problems to come up with
> > examples.
> >
>
> I personally have two real world examples that can give to you :)
>
> 1) I've a IoT device at home that has a bunch of sensors (temperatury,
>    humidity, etc) and a SSD1306 display panel to report that. It just
>    has small fbdev program to print that info. I could probably port
>    to KMS but didn't feel like it. Found a fbdev program that I could
>    modify and got the job done.
>
> 2) I built a portable retro console for my kids, that uses a ST7735R
>    LCD panel. The software I use is https://www.retroarch.com/ which
>    uses fbdev by default (I believe that supports a KMS mode but out
>    of the box it works with fbdev and that's better tested by them.
>
> So even when I'm not interested and don't want to enable any of the
> fbdev drivers, I want to use the ssd130x and st7735r DRM drivers and
> the DRM fbdev emulation layer.
>
> In other words, there's real use cases for supporting fbdev programs
> with DRM drivers. Now, I agree with this patch-set and probably will
> disable the user-space fbdev interface in Fedora, but on my embedded
> projects I will probably keep it enabled.
>
> That's why I think that we should support the following combinations:
>
> * fbdev drivers + DRM fbdev emulation + fbdev user-space

"fbdev drivers + fbdev user-space", I assume?

> * only DRM drivers without fbdev emulation nor fbdev user-space (your series)

Thomas' series includes fbdev emulation here, for the text console.

> * only DRM fbdev emulation + fbdev user-space enabled (FB_CORE)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.