Re: [PATCH 22/30] fbdev/smscufx: Detect registered fb_info from refcount

Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> writes:

Hello Thomas,

> Hi Javier
>
> Am 08.06.23 um 00:22 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>> Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> Detect registered instances of fb_info by reading the reference
>>> counter from struct fb_info.read. Avoids looking at the dev field
>>> and prepares fbdev for making struct fb_info.dev optional.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Steve Glendinning <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/video/fbdev/smscufx.c | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/smscufx.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/smscufx.c
>>> index 17cec62cc65d..adb2b1fe8383 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/smscufx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/smscufx.c
>>> @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ static int ufx_setup_modes(struct ufx_data *dev, struct fb_info *info,
>>>   	u8 *edid;
>>>   	int i, result = 0, tries = 3;
>>>   
>>> -	if (info->dev) /* only use mutex if info has been registered */
>>> +	if (refcount_read(&info->count)) /* only use mutex if info has been registered */
>> 
>> The struct fb_info .count refcount is protected by the registration_lock
>> mutex in register_framebuffer(). I think this operation isn't thread safe ?
>
> It's an atomic read.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/refcount.h#L147
>

Yes, is an atomic read but by reading [0] my understanding is that does
not provide memory ordering guarantees. Maybe I misunderstood though...

[0]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.html

> And that function is only being called from the USB probe callback 
> before registering the framebuffer. It's not clear to me how the value 
> could be anything but zero. I'd best leave it as is with the ref counter.
>

Yes, I'm OK with that and as mentioned I don't think that's less safe
than the previous info->dev check with regard to race conditions.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.