Re: [PATCH v2 01/38] backlight/bd6107: Compare against struct fb_info.device
Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi
Am 13.06.23 um 12:37 schrieb Daniel Thompson:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:07:39PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Struct bd6107_platform_data refers to a platform device within
>> the Linux device hierarchy. The test in bd6107_backlight_check_fb()
>> compares it against the fbdev device in struct fb_info.dev, which
>> is different. Fix the test by comparing to struct fb_info.device.
>>
>> Fixes a bug in the backlight driver and prepares fbdev for making
>> struct fb_info.dev optional.
>>
>> v2:
>> * move renames into separate patch (Javier, Sam, Michael)
>>
>> Fixes: 67b43e590415 ("backlight: Add ROHM BD6107 backlight driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: <[email protected]> # v3.12+
>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
Thanks for going through the backlight patches.
>
>
> Daniel.
>
> PS Please don't treat this as an Acked-by, if you want to land this
> patchset via a single tree please coordinate with Lee Jones!
I'd like to merge them via drm-misc-next together with the rest of the
patchset. It's not DRM, but fbdev patches often go through that tree
quite often.
Best regards
Thomas
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
OpenPGP_signature
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B) - not displayed