Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sh: dma: Correct the number of DMA channels in SH7709
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdV=kc1sZfsBad99ofbUBUyuZ_fAekdkFJYp9Rhskf9xWg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Adrian, On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 9:32 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2023-06-08 at 12:03 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > > That is actually safer, as the user can override NR_ONCHIP_DMA_CHANNELS > > > > > when configuring his kernel, thus breaking DMA due to an incorrect > > > > > value of SH_DMAC_NR_MD_CH. > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately we cannot protect against that when using a single DMAC, > > > > > as SH_DMAC_NR_MD_CH can be either 4, 6, or 8. > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this configuration should be moved from Kconfig to <cpu/dma.h>, > > > > > to protect against a user overriding this value? > > > > > > > > Isn't SH_DMAC_NR_MD_CH already hardwired to the SoC being used? > > > > > > It depends on CONFIG_NR_ONCHIP_DMA_CHANNELS, while it > > > should be fixed based on the SoC. > > > > I agree. However, I would be fine with merging this patch set first and fixing > > this particular issue in a follow-up series. > > So, my suggestion is to take this series as-is for 6.5, then get the other issues > you mentioned fixed for 6.6. I think it's already a gain when these issues are > fixed and the kernel boots on the HP Journada 680 again. Sure, I don't want to block the acceptance of this series at all. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds