Re: [PATCH v5 26/33] nios2: Convert __pte_free_tlb() to use ptdescs

On 6/27/23 13:05, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/27/23 14:56, Vishal Moola wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:14 PM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/27/23 12:10, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 6/27/23 10:42, Vishal Moola wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:47 PM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:57:38PM -0700, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
>>>>>>> Part of the conversions to replace pgtable constructor/destructors with
>>>>>>> ptdesc equivalents.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch causes all nios2 builds to fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like you tried to apply this patch on its own. This patch depends
>>>>> on patches 01-12 of this patchset to compile properly. I've cross-compiled
>>>>> this architecture and it worked, but let me know if something fails
>>>>> when its applied on top of those patches (or the rest of the patchset).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, I did not try to apply this patch on its own. I tried to build yesterday's
>>>> pending-fixes branch of linux-next.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A quick check shows that the build fails with next-20230627. See log below.
>>
>> Ah it looks like this one slipped into -next on its own somehow? Stephen, please
>> drop this patch from -next; it shouldn't be in without the rest of the
>> patchset which
>> I intend to have Andrew take through the mm tree.
>>
> 
> I apologize, but I queue this patch up for Linus and it's been pulled for this merge window. I didn't realize you were going to take this patchset through another tree.
> 
> Sorry about that.
> 

Yes, indeed, I just confirmed that all nios2 builds in the mainline kernel
are now broken.

Guenter