Re: [PATCH v1] sh: boards: fix CEU buffer size passed to dma_declare_coherent_memory()

Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:29:27PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-07-24 at 20:12 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:07:42PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > From: Petr Tesarik <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > In all these cases, the last argument to dma_declare_coherent_memory() is
> > > the buffer end address, but the expected value should be the size of the
> > > reserved region.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 39fb993038e1 ("media: arch: sh: ap325rxa: Use new renesas-ceu camera driver")
> > > Fixes: c2f9b05fd5c1 ("media: arch: sh: ecovec: Use new renesas-ceu camera driver")
> > > Fixes: f3590dc32974 ("media: arch: sh: kfr2r09: Use new renesas-ceu camera driver")
> > > Fixes: 186c446f4b84 ("media: arch: sh: migor: Use new renesas-ceu camera driver")
> > > Fixes: 1a3c230b4151 ("media: arch: sh: ms7724se: Use new renesas-ceu camera driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
> > 
> > But given that nobody noticed for 5 years, maybe we should drop
> > renesas-ceu support from those boards ? Or drop the boards completely ?
> 
> arch/sh is being maintained again, so it's save to keep these boards. At some point, we're
> going to convert the architecture to using Device Trees which should reduce the maintenance
> burden anyways.

Keeping the architecture is fine for newer systems, but is anyone really
maintaining the Renesas SH board ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.