Re: [PATCH 4/4] sh: machvec: remove custom ioport_{un,}map()
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 16:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:08 PM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 14:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:49 PM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Do you have a link to that series? I don't understand why you'd >> want to enable GENERIC_IOMAP on sh, given that its PIO accesses >> are always memory mapped in the end. > > "[RESEND RFC PATCH 00/12] DeviceTree support for SH7751 based boards." > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sh/[email protected]/ Ok, thanks. > In the meantime, there is a v2, which I wasn't aware of when I wrote > my previous email, so perhaps my comment is no longer valid. > "[RFC PATCH v2 00/30] Device Tree support for SH7751 based board" > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sh/[email protected] Right, it looks like the GENERIC_IOMAP part if gone from that series, and I also see that the PCI host bridge does not actually map the port I/O window. That's usually fine because very few drivers actually need it, and it also means that there should be no need for GENERIC_IOMAP or the simpler alternative. The first version probably only did it accidentally, which is a common mistake, and I think the ones for hexagon, m68k, and mips can probably be removed as well with some simplifiations. x86 and ia64 want GENERIC_IOMAP because they require using custom instructions for accessing IORESOURCE_IO registers, but it's not really generic. Arnd