Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ltp,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdXGwyS-CL0vLdUP4Z4YEYhmcmDyC3YdGCnS=jFkqASqvw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Petr, CC other uClinux arch lists On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 2:52 AM Petr Vorel <[email protected]> wrote: > UCLINUX is broken in LTP and nobody really cares. Actually I dare to > say UCLINUX is dead. Therefore I prepared patchset to remove UCLINUX > from LTP. We have been actively removing UCLINUX from LTP during rewrite > tests to new LTP API. This removes the rest from the old tests (which > will be sooner or later rewritten to new API). > > Because the patchset is quite big, I did not want to send it to mailing > lists (but I can do it if you want). > > Can you please have look at my fork on gitlab, branch: remove-UCLINUX > https://gitlab.com/pevik/ltp/-/commits/remove-UCLINUX?ref_type=heads > > Build test: > https://github.com/pevik/ltp/actions/runs/7392470215 Thanks for your series! I see you only CCed linux-m68k, but AFAIK, uClinux is not restricted to m68k/coldfire, but also available on arm32, riscv, sh, and xtensa. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds