Re: [PATCH linux-next v3 06/14] x86, crash: wrap crash dumping code into crash related ifdefs

Baoquan He <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.kexec,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.riscv
Message-ID <ZbInIQeIoPj6R0kY@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 01/25/24 at 05:12am, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Baoquan He <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 8:10 PM
> > 
> > On 01/24/24 at 11:02pm, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > index 01fa06dd06b6..f8163a59026b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static void hv_machine_shutdown(void)
> > > >  		hyperv_cleanup();
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> > > >  static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	if (hv_crash_handler)
> > > > @@ -221,6 +222,7 @@ static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >  	/* Disable the hypercall page when there is only 1 active CPU. */
> > > >  	hyperv_cleanup();
> > > >  }
> > > > +#endif
> > > >  #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
> > >
> > > Note that the #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is nested inside
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CODE here, and in the other Hyper-V code
> > > just below.   It's also nested in xen_hvm_guest_init() at the bottom
> > > of this patch.  But the KVM case of setting crash_shutdown is
> > > not nested -- you changed #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE to #ifdef
> > > CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP.
> > >
> > > I think both approaches work because CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP implies
> > > CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, but I wonder if it would be better to *not* nest
> > > in all cases.  I'd like to see the cases be consistent so in the future
> > > someone doesn't wonder why there's a difference (unless there's
> > > a reason for the difference that I missed).
> > 
> > I agree with you, it's a great suggestion. Thanks.
> > 
> > Do you think below draft patch includes all changes you are concerned
> > about?
> 
> Yes, these changes look good as a delta to your original patch.
> 
> But also look at xen_hvm_guest_init().  It looks like your original patch
> does nesting there as well, and it could probably be "un-nested".

Right. I checked them all in arch/x86 this time, hope nothing is missed
again. I can post a v4 to update this x86 patch later if no other
concern. Thanks.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
index f8163a59026b..2e8cd5a4ae85 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
@@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ static void hv_machine_shutdown(void)
 	if (kexec_in_progress)
 		hyperv_cleanup();
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
 static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -222,8 +223,7 @@ static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	/* Disable the hypercall page when there is only 1 active CPU. */
 	hyperv_cleanup();
 }
-#endif
-#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
+#endif /* CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP */
 #endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
 
 static uint32_t  __init ms_hyperv_platform(void)
@@ -497,9 +497,11 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
 	no_timer_check = 1;
 #endif
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) && defined(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
+#if defined(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)
 	machine_ops.shutdown = hv_machine_shutdown;
-#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
+#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)
 	machine_ops.crash_shutdown = hv_machine_crash_shutdown;
 #endif
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
index 1287b0d5962f..f3130f762784 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void machine_halt(void)
 	machine_ops.halt();
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
+#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
 void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	machine_ops.crash_shutdown(regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
index 09e3db7ff990..0b367c1e086d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static void xen_hvm_shutdown(void)
 	if (kexec_in_progress)
 		xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_soft_reset);
 }
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
 static void xen_hvm_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -156,7 +157,6 @@ static void xen_hvm_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_soft_reset);
 }
 #endif
-#endif
 
 static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_hvm(unsigned int cpu)
 {
@@ -238,10 +238,10 @@ static void __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
 	machine_ops.shutdown = xen_hvm_shutdown;
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
 	machine_ops.crash_shutdown = xen_hvm_crash_shutdown;
 #endif
-#endif
 }
 
 static __init int xen_parse_nopv(char *arg)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.