Re: [PATCH linux-next v3 01/14] kexec: split crashkernel reservation code out from crash_core.c

Baoquan He <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.kexec,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv
Message-ID <ZbcGHoLZfqro7i8g@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 01/28/24 at 02:28am, Klara Modin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2024-01-24 06:12, Baoquan He wrote:
> > And also add config item CRASH_RESERVE to control its enabling of the
> > codes. And update config items which has relationship with crashkernel
> > reservation.
> > 
> > And also change ifdeffery from CONFIG_CRASH_CORE to CONFIG_CRASH_RESERVE
> > when those scopes are only crashkernel reservation related.
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 502986237cb6..a9243e0948a3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_HOTPLUG
> >   	def_bool y
> >   config ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION
> > -	def_bool CRASH_CORE
> > +	def_bool CRASH_RESEERVE
> >   config PHYSICAL_START
> >   	hex "Physical address where the kernel is loaded" if (EXPERT || CRASH_DUMP)
> 
> CRASH_RESEERVE is probably a typo and should be CRASH_RESERVE (with the
> former ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION isn't defined in my .config
> and `crashkernel=...` parameter has no effect).

You are right, thanks a lot. Will fix that.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.