Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kconfig: remove 'optional' property support

Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kbuild.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.documentation
Message-ID <CAK7LNAQJi8UsWfURN0=T2-Uj8kha+-SQWiWBZRhB23dr9havSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:24 PM Nicolas Schier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:41:04AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > The 'choice' statement is primarily used to exclusively select one
> > option, but the 'optional' property allows all entries to be disabled.
> >
> > In the following example, both A and B can be disabled simultaneously:
> >
> >     choice
> >             prompt "choose A, B, or nothing"
> >             optional
> >
> >     config A
> >             bool "A"
> >
> >     config B
> >             bool "B"
> >
> >     endchoice
> >
> > You can achieve the equivalent outcome by other means.
> >
> > A common solution is to add another option to guard the choice block.
> > In the following example, you can set ENABLE_A_B_CHOICE=n to disable
> > the entire choice block:
> >
> >     choice
> >             prompt "choose A or B"
> >             depends on ENABLE_A_B_CHOICE
> >
> >     config A
> >             bool "A"
> >
> >     config B
> >             bool "B"
> >
> >     endchoice
> >
> > Another approach is to insert one more entry as a place-holder:
> >
> >     choice
> >             prompt "choose A, B, or disable both"
> >
> >     config A
> >             bool "A"
> >
> >     config B
> >             bool "B"
> >
> >     config DISABLE_A_AND_B
> >             bool "choose this to disable both A and B"
> >
> >     endchoice
> >
> > Some real examples are DEBUG_INFO_NONE, INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_NONE,
> > LTO_NONE, etc.
> >
> > The 'optional' property is even more unnecessary for a tristate choice.
> >
> > Without the 'optional' property, you can disable A and B; you can set
> > 'm' in the choice prompt, and disable A and B individually:
> >
> >     choice
> >             prompt "choose one built-in or make them modular"
> >
> >     config A
> >             tristate "A"
> >
> >     config B
> >             tristate "B"
> >
> >     endchoice
> >
> > In conclusion, the 'optional' property was unneeded.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > (no changes since v1)
>
> thanks for the patch!
>
> I found just one small remnant that probably should be removed as well:
>
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/tests/choice/__init__.py b/scripts/kconfig/tests/choice/__init__.py
> index 4318fce05912f..05e162220085c 100644
> --- a/scripts/kconfig/tests/choice/__init__.py
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/tests/choice/__init__.py
> @@ -8,4 +8,2 @@ The behavior of 'y' choice is intuitive.  If choice values are tristate,
>  the choice can be 'm' where each value can be enabled independently.
> -Also, if a choice is marked as 'optional', the whole choice can be
> -invisible.
>  """


Thanks. I will fold this.




>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <[email protected]>
>
> Kind regards,
> Nicolas
>
>
> PS: For other reviewers, this patch (set) depends on
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/[email protected]/



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.